Customise Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorised as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyse the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customised advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyse the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

12 C
Ennis
Clare Champion Print Subscription
12 C
Ennis
HomeRegionalSouth ClareLegal challenge to Killaloe bypass fails

Legal challenge to Killaloe bypass fails

Clare Champion Print Subscription

AN environmentalist has lost his legal challenge to a grant of permission for a 2km bypass around Killaloe.

Peter Sweetman, along with an environmental protection company, The Swans and the Snails Ltd, claimed the project, which includes construction of a 170 metre long bridge over the River Shannon, will result in the direct, permanent, and irreversible destruction of a woodlands habitat.

The High Court, with Mr Justice Paul McDermott presiding, heard the habitat in question, an alluvial wet willow-alder-ash woodland, is located on the western side [Clare bank] of the proposed bridge.
Mr Sweetman and the company argued permission for the project should never have been granted to Clare County Council by An Bord Pleanála. It was claimed the board failed to carry out an adequate assessment under the EU Habitats Directive.

Mr Sweetman, of Bunahowen Cashel, County Galway, and the company, with an address at Rossport, South Ballina, County Mayo, claimed an environmental impact assessment carried out by the board was deficient and did not comply with the directive or planning legislation.

Dismissing the challenge, Mr Justice McDermott found the board had received comprehensive technical and factual information in environmental impact and natura impact statements submitted for the application.

This was supplemented by further information, in response to requests from the board, and all of the material was “subject to extensive exploration” at a hearing before a board inspector, he said.
The board also carried out its own environmental impact assessment and had “ample information” before it when reaching its decision to grant consent for the project, he held.

By Tim Healy

A native of Ennis, Colin McGann has been editor of The Clare Champion since August 2020. Former editor of The Clare People, he is a journalism and communications graduate of Dublin Institute of Technology.

This Week's Edition

Latest News

Advertisment
Advertisment
error: Content is protected !!